next up previous
Next: Variation of System Width Up: Pile with Smooth and Previous: Pile with Smooth and

Comparison of Piles with different Slopes

The next situation we describe is a pile on a flat, smooth bottom, i.e. the particles in row M=0 are allowed to move. Only the left- and rightmost particles are fixed horizontally by the corresponding wall. In Fig. 6(a) we show the results for two tex2html_wrap_inline969 piles with tex2html_wrap_inline1061 and tex2html_wrap_inline1063 . The vertical component V of the stress is not constant and the horizontal component H is getting very large close to the walls, since vertical stresses are transferred into the horizontal direction and propagate directly outwards in row M=0. In the case of tex2html_wrap_inline1063 we observe a relative minimum of the vertical stress in the center, X=0.5.

   figure519
Figure 6: Components of the dimensionless stress tensor S(0) vs. dimensionless horizontal coordinate X=x/l at row M=0, for a pile with mobile particles at the smooth and flat bottom. We indicate the vertical stress with tex2html_wrap_inline979 , the horizontal stress with tex2html_wrap_inline981 , and the shear stress with tex2html_wrap_inline983 . (a) The slope of the pile is tex2html_wrap_inline969 , and tex2html_wrap_inline1061 or tex2html_wrap_inline1063 . (b) The results for tex2html_wrap_inline973 and tex2html_wrap_inline1067 (solid line) or tex2html_wrap_inline1069 (symbols) are compared to the result for tex2html_wrap_inline977 from Fig. 2(b). (c) Contact network for the left half of a tex2html_wrap_inline973 pile with tex2html_wrap_inline977 and bumpy bottom. (d) Contact network for the right half of a tex2html_wrap_inline973 pile with tex2html_wrap_inline1067 and smooth, flat bottom. The dashed line in (c) and (d) gives the vertical stress V for the corresponding piles.

In Fig. 6(b) we compare the result of Fig. 2(b), i.e. tex2html_wrap_inline977 to situations on smooth and flat bottom with tex2html_wrap_inline1069 and tex2html_wrap_inline1067 . The dashed lines give the vertical stress in row M=1 (c) and M=0 (d). We observe fluctuations at the shoulders of the pile and again a dip in the center of the pile, X=0.5. In order to find an explanation for this behavior we plot the contact networks in Figs. 6(c) and (d) for the large tex2html_wrap_inline973 piles with bumpy, tex2html_wrap_inline977 (c), and smooth, flat bottom, tex2html_wrap_inline1067 (d). The dashed lines give the vertical stress for the corresponding pile. In Fig. 6(c) we observe a contact network similar to the result in Fig. 3(b) for c=0. The center triangle is arranged on a diamond lattice and the shoulders are arranged on a dense triangular lattice, i.e. the horizontal contacts are closed. Only close to the surface we have a few particles on a tilted diamond lattice. In Fig. 6(d) the situation is more complicated. We observe three regions with different structure. Firstly a diamond lattice in the center, secondly a dense triangular lattice in outward direction and thirdly, the diamond lattice tilted outwards at the ends of the pile. In summary, we correlate the variations of normal stress V to the change of structure in the contact network.


next up previous
Next: Variation of System Width Up: Pile with Smooth and Previous: Pile with Smooth and

Wed Jan 8 19:15:00 MET 1997